Follow-up programs in training activities operate in three directions, which are implemented in parallel
This is done in three timings which are (before - during - and after) the implementation of the training program.
To achieve this, our organization does the following:
Evaluation of training effectiveness
Analysis of training activity for follow-up and evaluation
Measuring the return on human capital
Evaluation of training between cost and return
Given the over-funding of training programs at the expense of other institution activities, institutions cannot determine the true return of training without the use of effective evaluation tools and considerable efforts in this process. In addition, training managers and coordinators are deemed effective partners in order to achieve the training objectives.
Measurement and evaluation are essential tools for building an institutional culture based on training outcomes. In order to obtain evidence of responsibility and accept accounting in the training activity, data on this aspect should be measured, reviewed and evaluated.
We can then calculate the return on this investment by analyzing five types of data associated with five levels of measurement.
We rely on the Jack Fibbs model to be effective in measuring the return on training